Sylvia Jablonski
Leveraged & Thematic ETFs: The Defiance Way
Sylvia Jablonski is the CEO and CIO of Defiance ETFs. Her background spans delta one sales and trading, equity derivatives, and over a decade at Direxion ETFs (the leveraged and inverse ETF issuer) before she helped build Defiance alongside founder and chairman Matt Bielski. The firm offers a variety of products across leveraged single stock ETFs, income products, and thematics. On this episode of Behind the Ticker, the conversation focuses on QTUM, their quantum computing and machine learning ETF, and why that space represents one of the most exciting long-term investment themes in the market.
From Direxion Derivatives to Defiance
Sylvia's path to Defiance is rooted in the derivatives world. She started at major banks doing delta one sales trading, covering ETF issuers and hedge funds for swap trades. Around 2007-2008, the financial crisis, she was working heavily with swap-based products and ETF structures. That experience led to Direxion, where she spent over a decade building expertise in leveraged and inverse ETFs. Matt Bielski worked alongside her during those years, and when the opportunity came to build something from scratch, they launched Defiance.
The firm has also built a separate marketing company that started organically. When Defiance began having disproportionate success getting its brand out relative to its small size, other ETF issuers started calling to ask how they were doing it. That led to a marketing business that now serves some of the largest ETF providers in the industry. The marketing arm was eventually separated from Defiance ETFs into its own entity, creating a second revenue stream while keeping the two businesses complementary.
QTUM: Quantum Computing, Machine Learning, and AI
QTUM was designed to capture the broad ecosystem around quantum computing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. Defiance worked with BlueStar to create the underlying index, which identifies companies that attribute at least 50% of their revenue, commercialization, or research to super computing, machine learning, and AI. The fund holds about 72 names on an equal-weighted basis and includes semiconductor companies, hardware manufacturers, cloud computing providers, and pure-play quantum computing and AI firms.
The holdings span from household names like NVIDIA and Microsoft to less obvious picks like IBM (a major investor in quantum computing), Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and various semiconductor companies powering the AI infrastructure buildout. Equal weighting means the fund isn't dominated by the mega-caps the way a cap-weighted tech fund would be. This gives investors broader exposure to the theme rather than just buying a concentrated bet on the largest names they probably already own through the S&P 500.
Why Quantum Computing Matters
Sylvia makes the case that quantum computing has the potential to transform every major industry. Quantum computers process data in fundamentally different ways than traditional computers, allowing them to handle computations that would be practically impossible for classical machines. The applications span drug discovery and biomedical research (processing the massive datasets needed for cancer research and genomics), materials science (designing new materials at the molecular level), financial modeling (running portfolio optimization and risk simulations that currently take hours in fractions of a second), cryptography, and climate modeling.
The recent excitement comes from companies like Google demonstrating quantum supremacy, where a quantum computer solved a problem that would take classical supercomputers thousands of years. While commercial quantum computing is still in early stages, the investment in the ecosystem (hardware, software, error correction, cloud quantum services) is accelerating rapidly. Sylvia argues that even if full-scale commercial quantum computing is years away, the companies building the infrastructure, chips, and software tools are investable now and benefiting from the spending cycle.
Levered Products, Volatility, and Who's Buying
Brad also asked about Defiance's single stock leveraged ETF products, and Sylvia shared insights from the demand side. She pushes back on the idea that these products are "dangerous." The typical user is not a naive retail investor. These are high-conviction day traders and sophisticated investors who know exactly what they're buying. They often hold for short periods, have hedging strategies in place, or are using the products for specific tactical bets. From the issuer's perspective, volatile markets are actually good for volume in leveraged products because that's when the high-conviction traders are most active.
Key Takeaways
- QTUM holds about 72 equal-weighted names across the quantum computing, machine learning, and AI ecosystem, selected by companies attributing 50%+ of revenue or R&D to these fields.
- Equal weighting prevents mega-cap domination, giving investors broader thematic exposure versus a cap-weighted approach that would heavily concentrate in names they likely already own.
- Quantum computing can transform drug discovery, financial modeling, materials science, and cryptography by processing computations impossible for classical machines.
- Defiance also built a separate marketing company that now serves major ETF providers, born from other issuers asking how Defiance achieved disproportionate brand awareness relative to its size.
- Sylvia spent over a decade at Direxion building expertise in leveraged and derivative-based ETFs before co-building Defiance with chairman Matt Bielski.
Listen to the full conversation on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or YouTube.
Full Transcript
5,147 wordsMachine transcribed from Brad Roth's conversation with Sylvia Jablonski, with speakers identified automatically. Timestamps link to that moment on YouTube. Lightly cleaned, otherwise unedited.
Behind the Ticker is brought to you by UX Wealth Partners. If you're a TAMP user and you're sick and tired of the legacy technology they are run on and you want more customization and flexibility, as well as an AI-driven model marketplace, UX Wealth Partners is your destination. On top of that, they have institutional trading. So if you are an ETF issuer or an SMA provider looking for outsourced institutional trading, UX Wealth can also be your destination. So check out uxwp.com to find out all the ways UX Wealth Partners can help grow and make your practice more efficient.
Welcome to Behind the Ticker. Today we have on Sylvia Jablonski. She is the CEO and CIO over at Defiance ETFs. They have a variety of different product suites over there, whether it's levered stock, single stock ETFs, income products, as well as thematics. And today we are focusing on their quantum computing ETF, ticker QTUM. We talk about why that space is exciting and how quantum computers can change the world and why it's an exciting place to maybe look at start investing some of your capital. Now, one thing to note, we did lose about the last 20 seconds of audio.
So thank you, Riverside FM. However, all you really missed was some thank yous and their website, which is defianceETFs.com. So without further ado, please enjoy this episode with Sylvia Jablonski.
Hey, Sylvia, welcome to the show. Thanks so much for having me. Happy to be here.
Read the full transcript (58 more sections)Collapse transcript
So before we get started, why don't you share everybody a bit about your background and how you eventually decided to kind of start Defiance and break away?
Yeah, sure. So my background is pretty much, econ finance from the start. I always had an interest in markets and investing, even like pre-high school time and always kind of knew I was going to do something related to markets. ETFs weren't so popular back then. So it wasn't a job that I necessarily thought about, when you're kind of in university, you're thinking about like which banking program are you going to get into? And, so I started working out at the banks and doing Delta One sales trading and learned about swaps, equity derivatives, things like this. And I was covering the different ETF issuers and hedge funds for their different swap trades. And so I think it was like around 2007, 2008-ish, which was like the heat of the financial crash,
Really, where, I was really working a lot with swaps and, kind of like pro shares and direction and things like that. And around that time, I just like through having the knowledge of swaps and ETFs and stuff like that, I got the opportunity to join Direction ETFs, which is the Levered Niverse ETF issuer. And I worked there for like a decade or so, a little more than that, actually. And while I was there, Matt Belsky, who's the, original founder and chairman of Defiance, worked with me. So for, years, we travel around the country doing education on ETFs, capital market stuff together, trying to get people to buy the ETFs, hold the, hold the
Thematic ETFs, trade the Levered ETFs, all that kind of stuff. But we just got to know each other over the years and had developed this awesome kind of like rapport and trust and relationship. And we always, thought about doing something together. And, he went and started Defiance. And, shortly after, I joined him at the firm. And so I guess it's been around four and a half years or so since I've been there. And it's, to your point, like, it is taking a plunge, right? You go for like from a big kind of stable institutional player to a startup. And it's just been an awesome ride so far.
That's great. So before we get too much into Defiance, I always like to ask people, what do you like to do when you're not sitting behind the desk? Any hobbies?
Oh, gosh. Well, I have, we were talking about this a little bit offline, but I have a three-year-old and a five-year-old. So there's some like, my hobbies are kind of hiding in the closet, let's just say. But I'm just avid, avid tennis player. I absolutely love playing tennis. I love going to the US Open. I love watching tennis, kind of all things tennis. And then, if you go kind of go down that list, I also like ping pong. I also like pickleball, in general, racket sports. Um, but other stuff too. I kind of have like a knack for foreign languages, always like to travel and, um, big, big reader too. But my kids are kind of the hobby.
They take over. For sure.
That's the US Open is on my, uh, my bucket list of things I want to do. I've had a buddy who went, he said he loved it. Yeah, it looks, it looks amazing.
If you're playing tennis or like, like watch tennis, you'll get so, you'll get so into it. it's, it's just so much fun to watch and it's just become this cool, like, I don't know, it's changed. I've gone every year, like, for as long as I can remember now. Um, and it's also turned into like this cool New York city, like celebrity athletes spotting, fashion event. And, um, and yeah, and the tennis is, tennis is getting really good again. Like after all the grades kind of started to fade off, like now the younger players are, are getting to be, super exciting and competitive to watch and, um, so much fun.
You gotta go. Yeah, I, I, it's, it's definitely on my list and it's, I never was into racket sports. And then for whatever reason, like I started watching all the majors and now I think it might have been to that Netflix series. And then I really started to get into it. And now I watched like as many matches as I can, but definitely on my list and something I want to do. So, um, let's talk about kind of defiance as a whole, you have a pretty diversified lineup of different ideas, right? You have an income suite, you have a thematic suite, um, you have a leverage suite. So can you kind of talk about what goes into the decision of, what are you going
To launch? Um, where are you going to launch? And, and as you kind of come up with new product.
Yeah, sure. So in, in 2018, um, there, the market felt sort of like saturated and a lot of the ETFs that were coming out were similar in style, similar in, theme. And, and I think, around that time there was this kind of evolution of different types of, of thematic ETFs that hit the market and, and kind of, built their, built their spot and investors portfolios and, and, picked up some traction. So we started out with 5g and quantum. So now it's, it's interesting because now there's been this like chat GPT moment, but we're, we're thinking about like in 2018 and 2019, that's, those were the conversations we were having.
We were like quantum computing, machine learning, AI, like this is going to be the, the next big thing. It's going to happen next year. we were a little bit early for sure. Um, but we, we just kind of like really believed in that theme and just saw that everything was, everything was just kind of getting like automated. There were all these conversations about data, what to do with data, how to, um, had to make, like, like Facebook changing to meta, we kind of thought about that. Like, well, what does that, what does that all mean? And, um, so, so I think, we had a couple of thematic ETFs that were like
Very timely and, um, came when the market needed them. So 5g it's now stickers now 6g, cause now we're kind of thinking about that next level of communications with like, um, Starlink and things like that. But, um, when 5g came out, it, it was one of the hottest topics in the market. Um, you had Howard Jonas talking about it on CNBC all the time and then COVID hit. And when we were talking so much about like low latency, the ability to have connectivity and work well, work efficiently in different places and things like that. And so I think those two ETFs really put us on the map and made us a company. And then, we kind of started going through the different sectors and saying like,
How do we replicate this? If 5g is the future of communication, and quantum is the future of technology. Like what is the future of like, um, of, of energy and efficient natural resources? Could it be hydrogen? Um, what is the future of travel? Like what is really travel and, and, um, OOTD and things like that. And, we kind of came up with different ETFs to, to represent the themes. And then, we realized that the market started to kind of go a little bit, not stale, but it, it, it seemed like the hype around thematic ETFs was, was dying. And so we started thinking about like, well, what's next? Like, um, flying taxis or, um, is it going to be driverless cars, whatever it
Might be. And I, I think, with, with some of the tech pullbacks that we had first, you had COVID, right. And then you had 22 tech pullback and we were all tech. And so, our whiteboard moments were like, okay, we need to diversify the product suite now. Right. We're so heavily, um, geared towards tech and AI, which is amazing, but we need something else. Right. So, um, enter the, the enhanced income product suite. And so, we realized that there's this huge interest in, in, index based exposure with, which, with large monthly distribution payments, um, or weekly distribution payments that investors are seeking. And so we launched, the enhanced product suite, like the QQI, IWNY, JEPI, and
Then the target income funds. And those grew right away. Um, we, we got lucky in terms of, the awareness of those products and the amount of interest that came in right away. Um, and then we continued to build out products in that suite because the market was asking for it. And then we saw, what, what else does the market like? And the market really, really liked single stock, the video. And, um, and we thought that while a lot of people had filed for a single stock levered ETFs, not a lot of them had actually hit the market and the ones that hit the market, kind of did okay. But, but we thought, well, there's something else, there's something else missing.
There's a couple of names that people whip around all day that are kind of like volatile enough for day trading and interesting enough for, for people to trade, um, short term. And so, we launched MicroStrategy, um, Broadcom, Super MicroComputer, and Lilly in that space. And that kind of put us on the map as a leopard fund. And so, I guess like on the most basic level, we, we try to, and I know you guys do the same thing too. Like we all try to figure out what the, you have your brand and your DNA, of course, that you want to stick with, but we are big on what is the market telling us? And we've launched a lot of products that, that didn't make it right.
Like we, we had an EV ETF. We had an inverse, um, crypto ETF way too soon. Right. It didn't, it didn't trade a penny. And now these things have billions of dollars in it too. So, um, we try to listen to the market, try to get the timing right. And, and, we, we win some and we lose some, but luckily we've, we've won more than we lost. So it's been, been pretty good.
Let's, let's stick on the, the single stock levered, um, theme for a moment. Right. Um, you, you mentioned MicroStrategy, that's kind of, uh, also a little bit of a crypto play in and of itself. Um, so you actually recently filed to increase the leverage. I believe it was 1.75. It's now you're, you're filing for two. So like, what's the internal dialogue around like turning up that volume just a little bit and for the increased leverage, is it just to make the product a little bit spicier? Is that what people are asking for? Like what, what's the thought process around that?
Yeah. it came, the, the product is, it's probably one of the most successful ETF launches of the year. it's certainly the most successful ETF launch for us. And, our biggest day was actually, um, just, just the other day on Monday, I think it traded, close to a hundred million. So there's just so much interest in this and there are so many people in it and trading it and, market makers, institutions and whatnot. And they've just said that they'd be interested if we could get it a little bit higher, they'd be interested in seeing that. And so we're going to do that. Ask and you shall receive.
Hopefully you receive, hopefully you receive true, true.
Fair point. Fair point. I, the, the, caveat there and just plain where there is of course we seek regulatory approval to do it.
So. Yeah, that's right. We got it. We have to make the compliance people that will listen to this happen.
Exactly. Exactly. No, no guarantees in life. These are, intentions. Yeah.
That's great. So actually let's stick on, uh, so I think you kind of touched on this, but I'm always curious because I've talked to other issuers that, put out a single stock leverage or inverse. Is it, are you looking for like what's being traded or are you looking for what's being, uh, or a stock that's in, that's popular? Like what, what goes into the decision of saying like, yes, we want Lily or yes, we want micro strategies. Is it. Yeah.
Can you talk about that a little bit? Yeah. I think you hit the nail on the head. It's kind of all of that. So you look at, like you look at like, what are the most popular stocks that are also the most volatile stocks that, also have the highest level of volume. And that's kind of been the secret just in my career. And again, like, Matt and I come from direction. So like, we've been doing this a long time, all of the products that we tried to get really cute with them. We thought were phenomenal ideas. It's just like they, they would close and not trade, but, um, and even thematic leverage products like didn't do that well historically, but, um, all of the products that were just
Kind of like pure play sectors, volatile sectors, they were the most popular, like leverage semiconductors, levered tech, levered, gold miners, things like that. And so I think, bar non-semiconductors are the most popular stocks this year. They also happen to be very volatile. So when you have a two X DLE funds, those, the underlyings move and it's kind of the juice that day trader wants. Um, and that's the key too, right? Like we're, we're catering to sophisticated traders who, they, they make a decision every day as to whether or not they're going to hold it another day. They're often day trading it. They're holding it for shorter periods of times, or else, if they hold it for a longer
Period of times, they have a hedge, they have a rebound strategy, whatever it might be. So, um, like I, I think with that crowd, it's very much the, vol, vol kind of begets volume. Yep.
So let's talk, we're here to actually talk about quantum, uh, Q T U M, which is your quantum computing thematic ETF. So, uh, at a very high level, can you talk about what that fund is really trying to accomplish?
Yeah. So, this was, um, as I mentioned before, like when we thought about launching this fund, it was meant to be. our take on what is machine learning, supercomputing and AI. And so we worked with, um, we worked with blue star on this and created this index is called, essentially like, like quantum computing and machine learning. Um, and within it, you have like all the different sectors that make up everything that goes into AI machine learning and supercomputing. Right. So you'll have everything from all the semiconductor companies. You'll have like micro strategy in there and video in there, but then you have, um, like the Hewlett Packard's in there, the IBM is one of the top holdings because they're
Big investors in quantum computing. And it's just basically, looking at the different, looking at the, the broad based sectors that touch machine learning, quantum computing and AI and picking stocks that have, or can attribute 50% of their revenue or, commercialization or, or, um, like research around the idea of supercomputing machine learning and AI. And so we construct this index. It has 72 names. It's equal weighted, kind of like runs between rebalances, obviously. Um, but yeah, you're, you're really just getting the top names in class of, of, pure quantum computing AI and machine learning.
So without us, like trying to figure out what the world's going to look like in, five or 10 years, like what is so exciting about quantum computing? Why should people look at this as a theme that is exciting and investable and ripe for growth?
Yeah. so I think quantum computing can transform all of these, like, things and, and, and evolutions and innovations that we're all talking about right now, right? Like you have cloud computing, you have data mining, you have, um, the chat bots, you have research and data being done for drug companies. So quantum computers, quantum computers essentially, allowed, allows data to process in two different States. And it allows this to happen very quickly, faster than, any other traditional computer can do a computation. So if you just think about things like, biomedical research, like cancer research, all of this data has to be processed and it has to be, um, kind of parsed and it has
To be delivered. And so if you have a computer that's working, I, I just kind of like know a lot of people who, who do this for a living, right. And, and they might do cancer research. And so they'll kind of go out to, a huge computer in Minnesota and it'll take like seven days to process the data that they need in order to, to do whatever particular research thing you're doing. And a quantum computer can do that in like a second. Right. And so I think, one of the issues and like why it's kind of not mainstream now is it's still an R and D, right. So the, the computers have been known to, like make errors or, or, you know,
They're trying to kind of like sort out what the outputs will be, but they're getting closer and closer to this. And now there are systems like, Microsoft has, um, an algo that helps reduce the amount of errors and things like this. And so what I think will happen is that with, with AI and you need data and you need, that data to produce the correct information for the query that is being asked. And then if you, on top of that, have a quantum computer that can work in two different states and do it very quickly, that all becomes more efficient. And then it trickles down to like, creating smart cities, aerospace and defense, like having the ability to have more precise targets, right.
Um, during wartime, it's, it's communications, it's, it's 6g. It's, um, it's making the chatbots more efficient. It's having customer service, automation, robotics, things like this. I think, quantum computers can really like change all of that, make it kind of like work faster and more efficiently. Yeah, of course.
And so you touched on this, uh, it had kind of a high level, but the, the fund itself is looking at a, a third party index. Um, it was a blue star. I think you said, so, yeah. Yeah. So what, um, what are some of the things that it's kind of screening for in order to get inclusion in this index? Like what, what kind of states have to be met in order for a company or a company to be included in quantum?
Yeah, sure. So it's basically like the leading global companies in research commercialization of anything related to cloud computing. So that could be like high powered computing data connectivity solutions. It could be cooling systems. Um, it could be, companies that specialize in like perception and collection and management of data used in machine learning. It can be semiconductor companies that invest in supercomputing and high-speed computing. Um, and, and basically, these are, and these all sound like foreign things, I guess, but you'll recognize a lot of the names in there, right? Like I said, you have like a, an HP in there, you have an IBM in there, and then you have these kind of pure play quantum plays like an IonQ or a D-Wave.
Um, and you have, like the visualization types of companies in there, you have names like Margetti competing in there. And so it's really capturing like the top 70 names that are most concentrated and highly dedicated to this kind of transformative supercomputing technology.
And are, is there any, um, does the index do anything in terms of prioritization of those companies or are you equally weighting everything? Yeah. Yeah.
We're equally weighting. There's a, they're subject to a liquidity overlay, but they're, yes, they're equally weighted. And, um, like the reconstitution is on a semi-annual basis. And so, um, what's good about this too, is that you have access to these small cabinets, I'm just thinking about like the rate cut yesterday. Right. So this, this ETF is great. Cause you have all the large caps in there, like the, the NVIDIAs and the Googles and all that, like, they're kind of like a, a ballast for the fund, right? They're, they're kind of the companies that have the largest amount of money, well capitalized and they're investing in quantum competing, but then you have like the actual pure plays that are, they're more along the lines of like a small cap company and are
Going to grow into the space. And particularly, with rate cuts going a little bit lower, we're talking about small caps. You get a little bit of that small cap flavor in this too.
So you had mentioned right now, the fund has about 70 names in it. Um, is that a target you want to be around that 70 or could you see as more companies are coming out, um, kind of that number edging up as there's more people in the space?
Yeah, I think it could edge up if, I think it could edge up if there are more names in the space that, that meet, the different liquidity requirements and things like that. So I think if you get new quantum players and there's a couple of them out there that definitely like D wave is a recent inclusion that that's not a name that was in there, um, between 2018 and 2023, really that actually just popped into the index now. Right. And that's a pure play quantum computing company that's been around for a while, but just kind of wasn't liquid enough. Right now they're growing and, um, advancing and things like that. And so that gets picked up in there. And then, we were always looking at the IPOs in the space and, just seeing
If, if they fit the index, um, methodology. And so, yeah, it could change.
Are there any, are you finding within the index, any country tilts or is it a lot of it domestic here? U S?
Uh, no, there are definitely there. Yeah, there are definitely tilts. Um, it's, it's kind of, it's, it's a global basket. And so, um, you kind of have, yeah, you definitely have some Japanese exposure, China exposure, U S exposure. Um, those are probably the top three right now in terms of international exposure, but yeah, it's definitely a global fund. Sure.
So the million dollar question is, um, you're sitting across, from an advisor, they've got an already diversified model portfolio. Where are you recommending that they use quantum inside the portfolio? Where would you sleeve it?
Yeah. so the way that we see advisors use it is, some of them use it as like a satellite allocation, right? For most advisors have like five to 10% of their portfolio where they're, they're either, picking, um, picking like a, a, a flavor or a spice or, or thematic ETFs or lover ETFs or things like this and, or alternative products and, and things like that. And so we see them either putting it there or as a compliment to their tech portfolio. So, wherever they've kind of got broad based tech allocation, um, slash semiconductor allocation, that's where the CTF goes.
So let's go back to defiance. I'd love to pick your brain. You guys are four people were five. Um, you started in 2018. So you're, you're fairly new, um, and you're still small and scrappy. So, um, kind of, there's a lot of new issuers hitting the market that kind of fit this bill and you guys have had a lot of success. So can you talk about, your experience over the years and, maybe any advice you'd give to those like small scrappy new issuers to help them get to scale?
Yeah. I think we, we've learned that we have to be relentless. Like we would have a good idea and we would, kind of sit and think on it and, and really kind of, suss it out and, and, and, debate back and forth, whether, whether or not it's a good idea. And then some, some issuer would launch it, it would have a million dollars and we missed the boat, you know? So I think, um, like speed is your weapon, um, for, for sure. So I think, I think speed and being relentless about scouring the market, what's missing, what isn't out there, what is out there. I think really giving up on like egos or, or anything that has to do with like, I thought
That was a great idea and it didn't work. it didn't work, close it, move on. Like when you're a startup company and people might criticize this comment, but I think that when you're a startup and you're, you're very focused on balance sheet and, and you want to build a profitable company, both for your investors and, and, for the people who hold your products and for yourselves, you have to cut your losses, right? If an ETF comes out and it's been out for a year and people haven't traded a share of it, you have to kind of close up shop as a startup and think of something new. I think bigger, bigger issuers have a little more, um, leniency in that stage.
So I would just say, be manic about watching your balance sheet speed. If you have a good idea, bet, bet on yourself, get it to market. Um, and, and being relentless about products. Like we, we had a product that was, not performing well and, and we changed the methodology. So I think just always trying to, make sure you have the most efficient versions of your products out there, cutting your losses, managing your balance sheet really well. And, and, just, just being relentless about knowing that your competition is at your heels in the ETF industry.
And, and how do you guys think about, distribution and marketing? Because again, being small, um, and being balance sheet conscious marketing and distribution is expensive. So, uh, how have you gotten creative or how have you, cause the defiance name, when I got an email about having you on the show, like I knew the defiance name, right. And so can you talk about how you guys, um, really focused on brand and how you worked on kind of marketing and distribution early on to get that brand recognition? Yeah.
So I don't know if a lot of people know this, but we actually, we consider ourselves, experts in marketing and, and the way that the company is structured is you have defiance holdings, which owns defiance ETFs and defiance analytics. So we built our own marketing SaaS company, digital marketing, our, our, in-house advertising, in-house distribution, um, AI distribution. We've really built it in-house. And so around COVID when, you're a startup and don't have any salespeople that can go out and see anybody. And to your point, we don't have budget. We can't spend money on ads and, and marketing companies and PR companies and things like that.
Um, we, we found, the, the best tech and marketing expert and his name is, Jacob, he runs the marketing company and, Matt tasked him with basically building the best and most robust marketing and distribution, um, platform and company that would, would market our, our ETFs. And so we started to your point, we started having success with getting our brand out there. And then other ETF companies would call us and say like, how on earth are you guys, how are you doing this? Like you can't possibly have any money. You're so small. You have like two or three ETFs. Um, and then they offered to, to hire us to do their marketing. And so, we, we do marketing for some of the top ETF providers, um, in the marketplace
Right now. And that ended up turning into a business. And so we separated it out from, cause it was just kind of under defined ETFs. Originally we separated it out now. And so, we have our own marketing company. We do marketing for ourselves and we do marketing for other ETF issuers, other, massive asset managers.
Daily Market Intelligence
The Signal
Brad Roth's daily market brief — systematic signals, ETF positioning, and what the data is actually showing.
Subscribe Free →