Stevens & Malinowski
White-Label ETFs: Launch Without Building
Garrett Stevens and Rich Malinowski are from Exchange Traded Concepts (ETC), the very first white label ETF issuer in the world. ETC handles everything someone might need to launch an ETF: legal and regulatory work, custom websites, portfolio management, regulatory filings, marketing services, and distribution support. They also serve as sub-advisor for quite a few ETFs. This episode was recorded live at the Ultimate Client Summit in Dallas, and the conversation covers ETF industry trends, what makes a successful launch, and where things are heading in 2025.
The White Label Model and What's Changed
Garrett explains that ETC offers a full turnkey platform, but they're flexible enough to provide services individually too. A manager might only need portfolio management support, or just regulatory filings, or marketing help. The model has evolved significantly since ETC pioneered it. The industry has grown from a handful of white label providers to a competitive market, which has pushed everyone to improve services and reduce costs for clients.
Rich adds that one of the biggest shifts they've seen is from passive to active ETFs. Early white label clients were typically launching index-based products. Now, the majority of new launches are active strategies. This changes operational requirements significantly. Active ETFs need more portfolio management support, more frequent trading, and different compliance monitoring. With active products, you're selling a management style as part of the product, not just what you're investing in but how you're doing it. Rich notes that the growth of active has been the dominant trend in the ETF industry over the last few years and shows no signs of slowing.
What Makes a Successful ETF Launch
Both Garrett and Rich emphasize that having a great strategy is necessary but not sufficient. The number one factor in a successful launch is distribution. You need a plan for how you're going to reach investors before you file the paperwork. Too many managers come in with a brilliant strategy and no distribution plan, and those launches struggle regardless of performance.
They highlight three types of clients driving growth at ETC. First, individual managers with track records who want their strategy in an ETF wrapper, the classic white label client. Second, existing ETF issuers building out product suites. Rich points to SP Funds as a standout: they came to ETC with $80 million and one Sharia-compliant fund, and have since grown to four ETFs plus mutual funds totaling around $750 million in under four years. They kept building components so investors could construct complete Sharia-compliant portfolios. Third, conversions: managers moving strategies from SMAs, limited partnerships, or mutual funds into the ETF structure for tax efficiency and distribution advantages.
Rich makes a practical point about the tax angle: advisors can take their taxable client money and put it in ETFs while leaving non-taxable accounts in separate accounts. This gives advisors another tool when talking to clients about tax-efficient portfolio construction. He notes that across ETC's product suite, they haven't paid any substantial capital gains distributions in the last year or two, which is a powerful selling point.
Industry Trends: What's Coming Next
Brad asked what the next wave of ETF innovation looks like. Garrett noted that single stock products aren't done yet. Beyond leveraged and inverse single stock ETFs, there are at least 20 more things that can be done with individual names. There are also concentrated micro-baskets targeting specific themes with a handful of names, like RoundHill's Magnificent Seven ETF.
ETC already has a full suite of AI-driven products through Craft, a South Korean technology company that handles all security selection through artificial intelligence. These products have been running for several years, predating the current AI hype cycle. Garrett and Rich noted that while AI-related product demand is exploding, the managers who succeed will be those with genuine quantitative capabilities and real track records, not just a ChatGPT wrapper on a stock screen.
Key Takeaways
- Exchange Traded Concepts was the first white label ETF issuer in the world, offering full turnkey services as well as individual components like portfolio management, legal, and marketing.
- The biggest industry shift is from passive to active ETFs. Active strategies now make up the majority of new launches and require significantly more operational support.
- SP Funds grew from $80M and one product to $750M across four ETFs and mutual funds in under four years by building a complete Sharia-compliant suite through ETC.
- Distribution is the number one factor in success. A great strategy without a plan to reach investors will struggle regardless of performance.
- ETC already runs AI-driven products through Craft (years of track record), and expects more single stock innovation, micro-baskets, and mutual fund to ETF conversions in the next wave.
Listen to the full conversation on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or YouTube.
Full Transcript
4,760 wordsMachine transcribed from Brad Roth's conversation with Stevens & Malinowski, with speakers identified automatically. Timestamps link to that moment on YouTube. Lightly cleaned, otherwise unedited.
Behind the Ticker is brought to you by UX Wealth Partners. If you're a TAMP user and you're sick and tired of the legacy technology they are run on and you want more customization and flexibility, as well as an AI-driven model marketplace, UX Wealth Partners is your destination. On top of that, they have institutional trading. So if you are an ETF issuer or an SMA provider looking for outsourced institutional trading, UX Wealth can also be your destination. So check out uxwp.com to find out all the ways UX Wealth Partners can help grow and make your practice more efficient.
Welcome to Behind the Ticker. Today we have on Garrett Stevens and Rich Malinowski. They are from Exchange Traded Concepts and we are still live at the Ultimist Client Summit down in Dallas. Really focus our conversation today on what's happening and moving in the ETF industry. Some of the trends that the two of them are seeing and really for those of you who are thinking about white labeling and starting an ETF, some of the best practices in order to have a successful launch. So without further ado, please welcome Mr. Garrett Stevens and Rich Malinowski.
Hey Garrett, welcome back to the show. Thanks for having me.
Happy to be here. So it's been a minute since we had you on. So you are from Exchange Traded Concepts. So if you could, why don't you just update everybody who you are and what ETC does for clients? You bet.
Read the full transcript (52 more sections)Collapse transcript
So ETC, we are the very first white label ETF issuer in the world to our knowledge. We handle everything that somebody might need to launch an ETF. So we offer a full turnkey platform where we handle all the legal and regulatory work. We build custom websites, handle all the portfolio management, of course, all the regulatory filings. And for folks who don't need all of that, we also do those services individually. So we actually act as sub-advisor for quite a few ETFs out in the marketplace, handling their portfolio management work for them, but also can offer marketing services and custom websites and everything somebody might need. We've been around about 13 years at this point.
I think we've launched north of 100 ETFs during this time period, about $7.5 billion. And just about any type of fund the SEC will allow, we either have done or can do at this point.
Well, we are actually here live at the Ultimus Client Summit. And I met one of your partners here, Rich. And so, Rich, why don't I give you the opportunity to give your background and say hello to everybody and kind of where you fit in over at ETC.
Sure, Brad. Rich Malinowski. I'm currently ETC's general counsel. With Garrett and our lead portfolio manager, we're also the executive committee of the company and run the firm and the business. My background, so I've been in the asset management space for about 18 years now, primarily on the legal side the entire time. So I've been with a number of service providers through the years, started as a paralegal and migrated to attorney, and here I am.
So, Rich, what do you think is kind of one of the major differentiators that ETC offers? now we're seeing kind of a boom of white labelers out there as the ETF industry has really started to ramp up. So what do you think one of the key things that you guys are super proud of over at ETC kind of differentiates you guys from the rest?
From our perspective, I think it's a combination of experience and service. As Garrett mentioned, the firm is the first one to do this. the ETF industry overall is still fairly young, so I think having a length of track record is important, and just having the overall experience and seeing what others have done and getting a feel of where things might play out if you try to launch a particular type of ETF. And then where we place a lot of emphasis is on service and quality. We strive for a qualitative experience for the clients. When we say full service and turnkey, we mean it. We try to do everything possible to improve the client experience and make sure that we can guarantee the best outcome for them that we can.
So, Garrett, you and I were talking prior, and you had mentioned, you're starting to see this unique trend of advisors starting to kind of launch their own ETFs rather than, the traditional issuer having to build a product that you think the advisor is going to want and adopt. So, what are you seeing on that side of the fence? And, why would advisors want to be launching their own product?
Yeah, so it's a great tool for them. if you think back to the beginning of the industry, it was really index-based products, and it was really just, the massive issuers. And so what, our business has done is we've really kind of democratized this whole ETF space to make it easy for somebody to launch funds. We have launched funds for some of the largest financial services companies on earth, and we have clients that are a one-person shop, and we can work with everybody in between. This, the newest, kind of phenomenon that we're seeing, and it makes all the sense in the world, is that, a wealth management firm can launch their own product based on an existing strategy that they run,
And they can give their clients a more tax-efficient vehicle. They can do everything that they're doing in an SMA account, but do it for them in a tax-friendly way. Many of our clients are not even trying to market their products at this point publicly. They really just want to use it as a tool for themselves. Their clients want the tax advantages. They like the intraday trading. They like the liquidity. And so it's a really good tool for them to have to offer to an existing book of business. And it really differentiates them from their competitors to say, we can do this in an SMA, we can do it in an ETF, whatever works best for your situation.
So just out of curiosity, because I haven't, I haven't been following this as closely as you have, obviously, but are they naming their ETFs after their firm? Are they giving them a unique name? I guess visually or optically, how do these things look when they come out?
Yeah, so they do. They'll put their name on it. They'll put the firm name on it and name it the strategy that they may have, and they may be marketing in a different wrapper. But it's a great marketing tool for their firm. And ETFs being so publicly traded, you can pull them up on Google or Yahoo Finance in any way that a retail investor might see it. So it gives your firm a lot of visibility and credibility to have this publicly traded product
Out there. Yeah, no, that's great. And I think that the other thing that we've been seeing in the space, or at least hearing in the space, this might be a question for Rich, is, are we seeing any more movement in this mutual fund conversion space? I'm hearing it might be a couple of years now. Have you heard any updates as far as what the SEC is looking at, or what's going on with this conversion or ETF share class?
Right. So back when I was with Ultimus, we did our first mutual fund conversion about three years ago now. And it was quite a process. Definitely a learning experience. It got done, successfully converted a mutual fund with multiple share classes, consolidated all of that, moved it over, and now it's an exchange traded product. I think the trend has slowed down, mostly as a lot of the intermediaries and gatekeepers don't seem to be fans of it. At the same time, there's still questions about who's holding the products and how will they hold them after a conversion that leave some questions unanswered. And then you've got all of the recent share class applications with the SEC to copy the Vanguard model and offer either an ETF share class of a mutual fund or a mutual fund share
Class of an ETF. And I think the outcome of that is really going to end up dictating where conversions end up going. We could definitely see a lot of current active products not having to undergo a whole transformation if they can simply bolt on ETF abilities to a current mutual fund.
So would you mention the gatekeeper? Are you talking about the custodians?
Yeah, the custodians, ERA platforms, basically the predominant place where mutual fund shares are held and sold right now.
And that's, I'm assuming, has to do with money? Probably.
Salesperson compensation is, I'm sure, a concern to someone.
Yeah, I would think so too. But well, so we're, like I said, we're here at Altimus. There's a lot of talk about ETFs. We're talking about a number of things. So look, I know this is a hard question, but what do you think is next? Like we've had this wave of derivative and defined outcome products recently hit the market in a big way. We've seen a ton of thematics. We've seen, we're now seeing, levered single stock, whether that's inverse or, to the upside. So again, difficult question. Neither of you have a single ball or a crystal ball, but what do you think could be really next
We could see? it's tough to predict the future, but I think the unpredictability is probably one of the great features of the ETF landscape. Because an ETF issuer can bring anything to market to meet customer demand. And we've seen this with wave after wave. We've seen the thematics. We've seen the option products now. We've seen ESG. these are trends that come. And I think the industry is definitely meeting customer demand. With that said, I have no idea what's going to come down next on the pike. But at the same time, whenever that idea comes up, I'm fairly certain that the industry is going to be pretty quick to respond to it.
Garrett, do you have any ideas around that?
What we're seeing is certainly the trend is more towards active at this point. I think 75% or something of new funds being launched are active at this point rather than the index-based stuff. This industry is great at taking a good idea and beating it to death. And, I think the themes have largely been covered at this point. As soon as I say that, someone will call us with a new idea that nobody's done yet. But, you can only kind of slice and dice. Some of the index is so thin. And so I think this move toward active is really just starting to ramp up. When you compare the assets, obviously, in the ETF world to the mutual fund world, we
Have a long ways to go. So for being such a big industry, it is still very new. It's just not that old of an industry. We've only been around 21 years or something at this point. So there's a lot of upside left, I think, in the active world that you're just going to see more and more of.
Will you walk me right into my next question, which is, we know that the active, actively managed ETF space is growing significantly. Like, how do you see the balance now between kind of passive products and active? At least what I'm viewing, I have a little bit of a lens in the RI space, is you're seeing them, you're seeing advisors build traditional passive model portfolios, but they're bolting on some of these actives for whatever reason, whether it's to help dampen volatility, maybe it's to juice returns. Like, what are you hearing, seeing, and, where do you think the balance is now as, these actively managed ETFs are really hitting the market? Yeah.
I think for a long time we saw a lot of that kind of core and satellite approach. And I think now, this move towards active is where you have an advisor who can take that kind of core and active approach that they were doing and just putting the whole thing into an ETF. ETF. So, you're getting their active stock selection, you're getting their, sector allocations all in one vehicle, rather than having to own a bunch of different ETFs or a bunch of stocks and some ETFs as that advisor might have been doing before for their client, they can put it in one. And it makes it a lot easier for them operationally just to have one product to trade for a client,
One portfolio for them to trade. And then, obviously the, all the other benefits of the ETF itself.
So I'm just trying to think from an RIA's perspective, more from the client's perspective, like optically, how do you, I would have a hard time seeing a client being, I get the approach, I get why it's operationally better, I get why it's more tax efficient, I get why it's beneficial, but does it just come down to education to the client to say, hey, look, there's a lot, you have a highly diversified portfolio and we're doing it all
In one wrapper? It does. Yeah, it does that, but you're also, especially, again, back to the tax benefits, you can tell them that, here were the capital gains, that you got last year in this wrapper and let's put it into an ETF and you're not going to have that. I think for all of the products that we're running, I don't know that we paid any substantial capital gains taxes out in the last year or two for these funds. So, it's, it's been a, it's a lot of education to advisors and then for them to their clients to let them know why, this is a better approach. But what you're seeing is that the advisor can take their taxable money and put it in the
ETF, they're non-taxable accounts. They can leave in separate accounts if they want. But it, it just is another arrow in their quiver when, when they're talking to, to clients. And just as a, I'm thinking about it, I would add that when you look at passives, generally the type of strategy and as a component of a client's portfolio, the passive is a thing that they invest in. It's a specific index, industry, sector, cap range, whatever it might be, foreign, domestic, however you want to slice it. But when you look at the growth of actives, there's that manager component and it's how the money's managed. And, it can cross asset classes, it can rotate sectors, it can do whatever,
But you're selling a management style as part of the product. And I think that's what a lot of managers that come to us, are trying to market is also not just what they're investing in, but how they're doing it. Got it.
So as, as far as like kind of next waves go, I think, we've heard a lot about AI and machine learning. Obviously you've got the, the biggest performing and best performing stocks in the world in that space. Are you guys starting to get calls from managers that have, machine learning or AI strategies that they want to employ inside of an ETF? Have you started to see that wave start?
Yeah, for sure. Actually, we have a full suite of products already that are AI done. So, they, there's a technology company in South Korea actually called Kraft that we've been working with for a long time and we've had products for them for several years and they're completely, all security selection is done by artificial intelligence. And it's been, it's been great to watch. And we have more and more of those conversations with people who are, either utilizing AI in their process or in this case, AI is running the whole thing. And it's definitely here to stay.
So let's, let's flip on to a different part of the ETF space, which is kind of the growth of semi-transparent and non-transparent ETFs. The nice thing about ETFs is you generally can see what's inside of them, but this is, so do you think this is going to start to gain broader acceptance among investors? And I think too, I'm starting to hear, how can we get private equity or private equity-like products inside of ETFs as well? And I would assume those would be, pretty semi or non-transparent. So how do you view the growth or how do we gain broader acceptance among investors with these types of products?
I think that it, I think investors and advisors and the, and the people bringing those are, are accepting them. I think there's a lot of operational nuance to the, to the non-transparent or semi-transparent. You have the whole market making community. You have gatekeepers at various wire houses and things who are maybe less inclined to, to be in favor of the non-transparent. It's harder for them in a lot of cases, understandably. And so I think that is what has slowed kind of the acceptance of, of the non-transparent and semi-transparent. like you said, the benefit of ETFs for so long has been transparency. And that's kind of what people think of when, when they think of this.
And it's a problem for some products, you're dealing with, potentially a small cap ETF, for instance, and it may take a manager days or weeks to work into or out of positions like that. In an ETF, that's, it's not always easy to do because people can see it and potentially pick it off if, pick those trades off if, if it's not done right. So, I think, I think it will continue to grow, but I think it's just, it's got a little bit of a headwind on it.
So last kind of question about, the ETF market and the ETF industry, we, it's been such an explosion, right? Do you think we're at the beginning? Do you think we're at the middle? does it slow down? Are we just going to continue to see, product launches after product launches year over year? the growth, I forget how many product launches there were last year, but I believe it like Nisey broke the record for, for launches. So where do you think we are in the cycle of actually getting product to market or are we not even close to done? I think we're not close to done.
I think the industry is maturing, right? I think that, we always talk about it. And when we talk with people about kind of the early days of the internet, right? So this is, is not the very first days of it. Everyone, has a computer, right? So it's not, the, the very beginning of the ETF industry anymore. Um, but it's still early innings. Um, there, there's a lot of innovation yet to come. There's a lot of acceptance and uptake that will, will be happening over time. But I think that there's still a really long ways to go. Yeah.
So I kind of want to just pivot for a minute and take some time whenever I have guys like you on who see a ton of, issuers and managers and people entering the space, like, what advice would you have for them as they kind of sit around and think about whether or not they're ready to launch a product? They're getting to that point, a, uh, who are you talking out of launching product and why, and, and kind of be, what are they, what should their expectations be? once they get a product to market, it's out there, the first, six months and first year that product hits market.
Right. So first and foremost, and I got to wear my legal hat for this, but it's do your diligence, right? You, you're getting into a new business and you need to have a pretty good understanding of what you're getting into. Um, that's just a general comment. Um, specifically, I think what it's not that you want to discourage anyone, but you, you've got to manage expectations too. I think in some cases, and, and particularly with more of, of folks that are launching with something that's really in vogue and popular at the moment is that they're going to register launch and, billions of dollars are going to flow in. And there, and this is just a gem of an idea.
And it's, it's not launching an ETF is not a get rich quick scheme, right? You launch it, you list it, you have to establish performance. It's got to have a trade record of it. It takes time to really bring a successful product to market. Um, you've got, the, the importance of a track record is as important for an ETF as it is for a mutual fund, right? You have to show how you're doing. Um, and that's, I think that's part of it is just the educational, um, explanation to people that it's, it's going to take some time and you've got to finesse it and work it. And in the end, if you've checked off every box, you, hopefully you're successful.
Well, in that, finesse it and work it like, Garrett, what do you think people need to be doing, on a daily basis in order to make sure that they're not going to be exiting the ETF business in that first 12 or 18 months? We, everybody sitting at this table knows it's not cheap to run an ETF. Um, so, what do they need to be doing to make sure they keep the lights on and this is a profitable endeavor endeavor for them? Yeah.
Well, I think the biggest thing that, that we're seeing and that we talked to people about and, and to Rich's point, that this is a change is to try and make sure that when you bring the fund to market, you bring it with some assets. I think the days of launching a fund with, a couple hundred thousand dollars in it and it grows to a billion, those days are, those products are fewer and far between than they used to be. Unless it's Bitcoin. Unless it's Bitcoin. Occasionally you, you get one that catches fire and just blows up and takes off, but that's, that's not the norm the way it used to be. And, um, we, we hear a lot of different ideas when we talk to people, uh, some are better
Than others. And, the, as more of these kind of levered and inverse, products like you're mentioning have been launching, those are definitely hot money products and the money goes out just as fast as it comes in. And so depending on the type of product you're launching, you've got to be prepared for both sides of that coin. Um, but to the extent that you can launch with some amount of assets, the break even on a new product is somewhere in the $30 million range, it's kind of the industry norm, I think. And so you really need to have that as your target to bring the fund to market is to have those assets in it so that you can make sure that it's going to live and you can build
That track record. That's the biggest difference we've seen too, between asset passive and active is the fact that passive products are easier to market and sell, um, historically, because you're talking to somebody about a theme. You're saying you should buy this because robotics are hot. So buy all of the stocks in the robotics industry. That's an easy conversation for an advisor to have with a client. We should have exposure to this. With an active product, it's the same as any other active strategy. It's really easy to tell the advisor how great it is. And for them to say, you know what? That's cool. I'm going to keep an eye on that, right? That's not allocating to it. They want to see performance just like any other vehicle.
So you got to be prepared for a little longer runway with most of the active strategies. So you've got to keep getting the word out. I think, ETFs are one of these products that are sold, not bought, especially in the active space. So you have to be constantly creating awareness, whether that's through digital advertising, social media, those kinds of things. Keep the product out there in front of, of other potential buyers, but really focus on
Trying to have some assets when you launch. Yeah. I think it's important. I talked to people who are considering launching an ETF. Um, they just come to pick my brain sometimes and ask how my experience was. And I said, well, where are you going to get the first, 30 million? And they're like, well, we've got, two or three from friends and family. And I'm like, well, that's not, that's not going to work. It's not going to cut it. And are you okay with, with stroke and checks to, to keep this thing alive in hopes of it? So I'm going to ask a selfish question because I get to sit with two people that have been in the industry for a very long time.
Um, I've, uh, we launched our product about two and a half years ago. So what do we need to be doing? Um, we've got some experience, but to really institutionalize ourselves, to make sure that when we get to that broker dealer door, when we get our three-year numbers that we look and feel as if they are somebody that they're comfortable putting on their platform.
So this is where it's important to talk about the, the relationships that make your product run, right? It's not just you. It's not just one or two of you at your shop, right? You have bigger firms behind you. You have, your administrator, your accountant, your auditors, your, the funds distributor. These are very big firms who've been doing this for a very long time. Give them that comfort level that this is not just a, a one or two product shop. You have a lot of infrastructure behind you to run this thing correctly. Number one. But then it's really about telling your story and, having the ability to, when you go to the big wire houses and try and get in the door, one of the things that
They're going to ask is, okay, if I have a thousand advisors out of our 300,000 who want to talk to you, how are you going to answer all those calls? How are you going to be that customer service that they need? So you've got to have, by the time you're ready to get in there and you meet the asset threshold, you meet the time thresholds to get in there. You've got to be able to answer those questions of, yes, we can support your advisors. And so you need to have the marketing collateral. You need to have, when people Google your fund name, stuff needs to come up, right? You've got to be prepared and have that presence out there.
Well, guys, I really appreciate both your time. I, it's always great to get an update on what's going on in the industry. It's always good to see, the both of you. And before I let you go there, where can people learn more about Exchange Traded Concepts?
Our website, exchangetradedconcepts.com is the best place. You can, you can contact us right through the website. We have on Twitter, I think we're at ETC ETF, posting content on there pretty regularly these days as well. So we'd love to hear from anybody who has questions.
Well, again, Rich and Gary, thank you so much. Thanks, Brad. Bye.
Daily Market Intelligence
The Signal
Brad Roth's daily market brief — systematic signals, ETF positioning, and what the data is actually showing.
Subscribe Free →